A look at Utah State’s 17-player early signing class | Sports



The 2025 Early Signing Day has arrived and it’s brought 17 new players to the Utah State football program, all of whom signed with the Aggies in hopes of continuing their football careers and elevating both themselves and the program. USU head coach Bronco Mendenhall, and the program’s Director of Player Personnel, Evan Butts, spoke with the media Wednesday afternoon to discuss the newest additions to the Aggie football family.

First things first, let’s take a look at who is part of this signing class before diving into some of the players and general trends from this class.

Utah State Football 2026 Early Signing Class

Name Pos. HT WT Hometown High School
Luke Baker OL 6-8 270 North Logan, UT Green Canyon
Tiki Bell DL 6-4 310 Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Episcopal (Va.)
Dontae Dyson CB 6-1 170 Layton, UT Northridge
Brody Flores OLB 6-3 210 Aurora, CO Grandview
Brady Goodman QB 6-4 215 Mesa, AZ Mountain View
Easton Hammond OL 6-3 275 Millville, UT Ridgeline
Matekitonga Havea OL 6-6 315 Lehi, UT Lehi
O’Shea Jackson-Webb  CB 6-0 170  Clovis, CA Clovis East
Kaleb Maryland QB 6-0 195 Houston, TX North Shore
Cade McCall WR 6-0 180 Katy, TX Katy
John McClellan LB 6-2 215 Rohnert Park, CA Rancho Cotate
Preston McDaniel TE 6-4 225 Idaho Falls, ID Thunder Ridge
Lucas Neidig OL 6-7 270 South Jordan, UT Bingham
Jude Nelson TE 6-4 225 Long Beach, CA Millikan
Tripp Palmer OLB  6-4 200 Blanding, UT San Juan
Jackson Regan RB 5-10 200 New Braunfels, TX Canyon
Viliami Tapa’atoutai LB 6-3 200 Woods Cross, UT Woods Cross

Focus on in-state and regional recruiting

Of the 17 players signed, seven come from inside the state of Utah, two even from Cache Valley itself. Another three of those 17 come from states that border Utah. This is something that falls in line with something Bronco Mendenhall has made a theme of his recruiting. Mendenhall said he’s studied, though exit interviews, how proximity to a player’s hometown has correlated with their enjoyment and satisfaction. The results of that, according to Mendenhall, is that players within a six-hour driving distance or a single plane flight (i.e., not having to take connections and have layovers) made a significant difference.

“Their family seeing them play mattered,” Mendenhall said.

With that criteria from Mendenhall, virtually all of the 17 recruits are within either that six-hour drive or one relatively short plane ride to Logan/Salt Lake City.

Part of the emphasis on local recruiting can come with the worry that it might come at the cost of limiting the talent pool. The recruiting hotbeds of college sports have long been places like Texas, California, or most of the states in SEC country. Mendenhall himself outlined how he can’t compromise just to focus on recruiting players out of Utah.

“Was there any compromise made in terms of ability because of proximity? That can’t happen,” Mendenhall said. “Problems can happen when you compromise the ability standard for the proximity.”

But given Mendenhall ended up with a class filled with players in close proximity, it’s a sign he trusts local talent. Utah and the surrounding states have been a growing source of great prospects, and Mendenhall clearly doesn’t believe he has to compromise his standards for talent and athleticism even when focussing on regional recruits.

Development on offensive line

One of the most frustrating aspects of Utah State’s season was its offensive line. According to CFB Graphs, the unit ranks dead-least (136th) in FBS for pressure rate allowed on passing plays and is 89th in short yardage/goal-line situations. It hasn’t been uniformly bad (there were some bright spots in the run game), but it’s very clear improvement has to arrive by next season.

To that end, this recruiting class is unlikely to solve the issue in the short term but the pipeline is being started. Last winter the team signed Sam Brousseau, a 6-foot-8 offensive tackle out of Murray High School and added 6-foot-6 OL Tommy “Rock” Olsen in the same class. And in this year’s crop, the Aggies signed 6-foot-8 Luke Baker out of local Green Canyon High School, a 6-foot-7 lineman in Lucas Neidig, and the 6-foot-6 Matekitonga Havea, though the latter of those three will not be joining USU until after a two-year mission for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Developing these players will take time. After all, Jr Sia was a highly ranked recruit for the Aggies and only got his first collegiate snaps until his third year with the program. But, when everything is put together, Mendenhall is hoping his O-line will be a very intimidating group.

“I love the idea of possibly, two years from now, we’re in the Pac-12 and opponents are looking at our offensive front and say, ‘Where? How?'” Mendenhall said.

Excitement for new QBs

There are questions to be answered about who will be standing on the field behind center next year for Utah State. Bryson Barnes has served very admirably for the Aggies this season, overcoming being sacked numerous times and taking countless hits on QB hurries and throughout his 176 total rush attempts. But his career will end in the next few weeks after USU’s bowl game. So what’s next?

Two obvious answers present themselves. One is a popular answer: just look in the transfer portal, but just as likely is that USU will look in-house. They’ve got two notable options with CJ Tiller and Anthony Garcia, though neither were impactful on the field this season for the team at the QB position. Garcia did play a role, but as a wide receiver and gadget player, reeling in 19 passes for 338 yards and a pair of TDs while also completing 6 of 7 passes for 79 yards and four touchdowns. Tiller, a redshirt sophomore who transferred to Utah State prior to 2024, is the current third-string QB and has appeared in one game. He played five snaps in USU’s blowout win over Nevada a few weeks back but didn’t log any pass attempts, only one nine-yard run.

Beyond the portal or the players already present on Utah State’s roster, there’s a possibility that one of the incoming freshman quarterbacks make their mark. It’s unlikely, but not insanely so. Just look around at BYU or two of Utah State’s Mountain West mates, Hawaii and Nevada, all of which have had true freshmen start at quarterback for multiple games or even the entire season. And, according to Butts, Utah State’s two freshmen recruits could be in the mix as well.

“They’ll definitely have an opportunity to compete,” Butts said. “We’re really excited to get those two guys in. And then obviously, CJ being here too, he’s got a great opportunity to be the guy as well.”

The names of the two incoming freshmen are Brady Goodman out of Mountain View High School in Arizona and Kaleb Maryland from North Shore High School in Texas. These are two players that have put up impressive numbers and look good in their film. Goodman threw for more than 7,000 yards in his high school career and exactly 100 total touchdowns. Maryland has track-star speed and has put up impressive numbers as a senior, throwing for 3,387 yards and 31 touchdowns along with 500 rushing yards and five more TDs.

Mendenhall was asked about Maryland and noted that the Texas QB was very impressed by what the coaching staff did with a running QB like Barnes.

“It’s why he’s coming. And that’s an oversimplification. I’m not saying he doesn’t care about Logan. I’m not saying he doesn’t care about Utah State. And I’m not saying he doesn’t care about our approach. He does about all those things,” Mendenhall said. “He watched Bryson Barnes. And he’s watched Kevin McGiven coach Bryson Barnes and the innovation and the creation.”

Can Utah State hold on to its recruits?

The issue hanging over the head of any coach in college football when it comes to their high school recruits is the transfer portal. What happens when (not if) a recruit develops well but then seeks to leave the program to chase money and exposure? Utah State can put all the work into making these incoming freshmen Division I caliber players, but even in-state schools like BYU and Utah will scoop up athletes they previously ignored by offering bigger paychecks.

Mendenhall is keenly aware of this, as he must be and as all coaches are. His focus isn’t attempting the frankly unrealistic sentiment of holding onto a player for five years, but in keeping them at least one year longer than perhaps expected.

“It’s not only how do you keep them, but how long can you keep them.” Mendenhall said. “The better that we (develop), the more tampering will happen. And so a lot of times then it becomes an additional year. Our relationships, our culture, our success will then possibly hold a player an additional year. It might not hold them for all five. But an additional year.”





Source link

Share This Article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email

Comments

Related Articles